Insurance
Life Assurance – Case Study

Daniel, Brighton, Age 32

When Daniel applied for Life Assurance and Critical Illness Cover for his mortgage he encountered more trouble than he bargained for. He decided to apply through a firm of Gay Financial Advisers, as they have experience in avoiding the personal questions, HIV testing and loaded premiums that are all too common.

Both Daniel and his financial adviser thought it would be a straightforward task, as he only wanted £87,000 of Life Assurance and had no real major health problems of note. The application was within standard underwriting limits of £100,000, where a number of companies do not ask for a lifestyle questionnaire or HIV test.

Lifestyle questions normally ask if the person applying belongs to one of the following government recognised high-risk groups for HIV.

  • Homosexuals
  • Bisexuals
  • Intravenous drug users
  • Haemophiliacs
  • Recipients of blood products, during medical treatment you received outside the United Kingdom
  • Sexual Partners of the above groups

Single males are usually asked to take an HIV test.

On answering yes to Homosexual, or Bisexual some companies will then ask a further list of highly personal questions relating to sexual behaviour, monogamy, STDs and even your partner's sexual behaviour.

Application

Daniel's application was forwarded to a life assurance company that does not normall ask these questions. However, on this occasion Daniel received a personal questionnaire. Confused, he contacted his adviser and asked why he had been sent the questionnaire?

The advisers explained that he was within the normal criteria and that they did not understand why he had been questioned about his sexuality either. They promised to speak to the Life Assurance Company and get back to Daniel.

On approaching the insurer, the advisers pointed out that the application was below £100,000 and without any major health issues. The underwriter agreed, but then highlighted Daniel's occupation as his reason for sending the questionnaire. 

The adviser was shocked that an underwriter would use a person's occupation, in this case Cabin Crew, as an indication of a person's sexuality. Immediately Daniels application was switched to another company and the first application cancelled.

Daniel got the amount of Life Assurance he required, without personal questions, HIV testing and loaded premiums – gay men do not have to put up with discriminatory practices from the Life Assurance industry.

This was the first time that the advisers had experienced such speculative attitudes towards a single male's occupation. Fortunately they've not experienced this scenario since, and hope it’s an isolated case. 

Pink Finance

Pink Finance has added the following proposal to the list of suggestions we currently have for the Association of British insurers Best practice guidelines on HIV issues; currently being reviewed:

Life Assurance companies should not be allowed to use a person's occupation as an indication of sexuality. Using occupations such as Cabin Crew, Ballet Dancer and Hairdresser as an indication of sexuality is speculative and blatantly discriminatory.

Editor, Chris Morgan, is leading the group working on the behalf the gay community for change. He welcomes any comments, suggestions, and case examples of discrimination you may have to offer.

He has recently suggested specific changes to the Association of British Insurers (ABI) Guidelines, which will be put to the industry for first consultation. This is your chance to have you say, by forwarding any suggestions you may have. 

 

Subscribe to the Pink Finance monthly newsletter and keep abreast of what's new on the site by clicking here. Your address will not be shared with any third party and you may unsubscribe at any time.