|
Leaseholder Tips
Unfortunately when you buy a leasehold property it is
difficult to know how ethical your future managing agent and freeholder
are likely to be. Many stories appear in the press regarding poor quality
repairs, threatening letters and high management fees.
I'd like to share with you a real life story, which
will hopefully help you all.
In May 1999 the residents of No.123 Acacia Road received
a Schedule of Major Works relating to their leasehold flats. ABC Management
Company had sent them details of proposed repair and decoration to the
outer elevations and common parts of the building. The Notice stated that
comparable quotes were to be raised for the proposed work.
A couple of weeks later two quotes arrived from two
companies ABC Building Ltd and XYZ Building services. ABC were the £300
cheaper and their quoted price of £3,100 including VAT was fair
at the time.
At this point you should know that Managing Companies
must inform you of all works to be carried out over £1,000. If you
do have queries regarding the quotations provided you have ...... months
to reply. Once this time has elapsed the work can commence,
Now, at this moment in time we had no reason to query
the quotes offered.
In mid June work commenced with One cute and Two not
so cute workmen doing the necessary. Everything seemed fine; they were
sociable, friendly and polite. Within a week and a half the job had been
completed. One had even replaced some tiles in my shower for a little
extra cash. 
In fact none of the residents had any cause for concern
until ABC sent us the final bill for the works carried out. Upon comparing
invoices it became apparent that the overall total charge was £5,500.
(Spot the difference). On closer inspection of the work carried out, the
residents discovered rotten windows painted over, paint already flaking
due to poor preparation and in some areas was missed completely.
The residents decided to air their annoyance to the
management company and point out the defective work. ABC replied stating
that it was common for leaseholders to deliberately avoid payment and
that the works had in their opinion been completed to a satisfactory standard.
The residents decided to approach the Leaseholder Advisory
Service for guidance. LEASE, as they are known, offer free information
and advice for matters relating to disputed management fees, service charges
and work carried out. They were able to enlighten the residents as to
their rights. LEASE also are able to provide examples of past cases and
any outcome. 
Action
The initial actions that were suggested
Contact Your Mortgage Provider
Withholding ground rent, maintenance and service charges
is a breach of your lease. The managing agent could approach the mortgage
lender for any outstanding amounts and in turn they are then added to
the outstanding mortgage. If you contact your lender first and tell them
that you are in dispute, they will note it on your file. You should specifically
request that they refrain from paying the managing agent until you tell
them otherwise. Tell them that you are not avoiding payment, but require
value for money.
Residents Association
LEASE should be able to provide a model constitution
for your association. The association should have a Chairperson, Secretary
and Treasurer. You should open a bank account and members should contribute
a membership fee. This will show the management company you are all acting
with one voice and that you are organised! You should gain the acknowledgement
of the management company that the "Residents Association exists".
From this point onwards you should only answer correspondence as a collective
group and demand to be addressed as the "Association". 
Former Cases
All residents should compare notes and share information
about any past disputes. This may help in the future if you try to prove
mismanagement and negligence.
Record Defective Work
You should record the defective work. Make a list of
every defective area, take photographs and if possible employ a chartered
surveyor to witness your complaints.
On comparing past work carried out, the residents discovered
that the same building companies had quoted for the last 10 years. Every
single time the ABC Building quote had ended up at around £200-£300
less than XYZ (how convenient). It also appeared that although residents
had complained before they failed to achieve satisfaction, this was due
to not being organised and complaining as individuals. 
The residents followed all of the advice listed above
and sent a letter to ABC Management Company listing all defective works
and enclosing their surveyor's report. The surveyor believed the work
to be of poor quality and only worth a figure of £2,500 inclusive
of VAT. They pointed out that they had already contacted their mortgage
lender regarding the dispute and that any future correspondence should
only be addressed to the "Residents Association".
ABC repeated their accusation of avoiding payment and
highlighted that each leasehold would be in breach of their lease. The
letter received by the "Association" was obviously intended
to test the nerve of the individuals involved. The management company
were hoping that the suggestion of them taking further legal action would
be enough to settle the matter. Bully tactics are not uncommon as the
first route the agents employ. 
Tribunal
It may be useful to know that the "Association"
could apply to the "Leaseholder's Valuation Tribunal" (LVT)
to assess the case. For £500, a Panel could independently judge
your case. The evidence that you've been collecting at this point could
become very valuable. The LVT can assess what is a reasonable cost for
work, reasonable standards for work carried out and fees for management.
They can assess if the works were necessary. If the specifications for
the work were adequate and if proper procedure was followed, they could
even order that a Buildings Manager is appointed to assess future work
and in extreme cases of mis-management, order a change of agent. They
are not able to award costs.
The "Association" decided to inform ABC Management
of their intention to make an application to the LVT to assess the case.
(If you make a threat like this you should be prepared to follow it through). 
A week later a letter arrived from the Managing Agent
informing "The Association" that they had appointed an independent
surveyor to assess the list of defective work. The residents ensured that
their interests were represented and arranged to be present during the
survey. They made certain that no area was overlooked and provided a copy
of the previous surveyors report.
On inspecting the property the "independent surveyor"
could only agree with the residents. He recommended that the price for
the work should be cut to £2,500 inclusive, with the defective areas
put right. He also provided photographs of all defective and unfinished
parts.
The Freeholder on hearing this news demanded that ABC
were to stand the cost of the second survey and reduce their management
charges in-line with the surveyor's estimate. He also demanded that the
whole job was to be re-done. 
After years of what appears to be poor management and
high charges ABC had finally met their match. ABC will certainly be more
careful about how they conduct works at Acacia Avenue in the future that
is providing they are still managing the property in three years time
when the next major works are due. The ordeal has convinced The Residents
Association that they would be better off without the Freeholder and Managing
Agent. Now they are organised and have a sound source of advice via the
Leaseholders Advisory Service, they have put wheels in motion to force
the sale of the freehold.
If you're experiencing problems via a Managing Agent
or Freeholder then don't be frightened to stand you ground. Find out your
rights, follow the law and don't loose your nerve. Most of the time, managing
agents are left to their own devices. It is unusual for managing agents
to meet organised Residents with a desire to gain satisfaction. If you
show them that they're not dealing with "muppets" and you are
aware of your rights, they will treat you with much more respect. 
LEASE - Leaseholders
Advisory Service - Tel: (020) 7493 3116
|